Difference between revisions of "Stm32Dev - rev. b"

From Stm32World Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
The reasoning behind these choices should be pretty darn obvious, but let me go through them anyway.
 
The reasoning behind these choices should be pretty darn obvious, but let me go through them anyway.
  
[[File:Jumper leads on headers.jpg|thumb|Jumper leads on headers]]I absolutely positively despise breadboards.  True, I might have had bad experiences because my breadboards were cheap crap, but I find myself spending more time chasing down lose connections than I do doing anything productive, so I generally much prefer just to wire stuff up using jumper leads directly on the headers.
+
[[File:Jumper leads on headers.jpg|thumb|Jumper leads on headers]]I absolutely positively despise breadboards.  True, I might have had bad experiences because my breadboards were cheap crap, but I find myself spending more time chasing down lose connections than I do doing anything productive, so I generally much prefer just to wire stuff up using jumper leads directly on the headers. By using that approach I regularly end up in a situation where I need two leads connected to one pin, hence having a dual row is convenient.
 +
 
 +
The [[LDO]] on the original board was massively over dimensioned (can handle up to 1-2 amps).  Switched that to a [https://lcsc.com/product-detail/Dropout-Regulators-LDO_Torex-Semicon-XC6206P332MR_C5446.html Torex Semicon XC6206P332MR] which will happily handle the 500 mA possible from a [[USB]] port.
 +
 
 +
Having the buttons is just a massive convenience on a development board.
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
== Schematics ==  
 
== Schematics ==  

Revision as of 02:43, 25 November 2020

STM32Dev rev. b

When designing the Stm32Dev - first version a number of mistakes was made. This lead naturally to the development of Stm32Dev - rev. b.

While the overall design is identical to the first version, a number of tweaks were made. These include:

  • Double headers
  • Different choice of LDO
  • Buttons for NRST and Boot0
  • 8 MHz Crystal
  • Regular blue LED on PC13
  • WS2812B hanging off of PC6

The reasoning behind these choices should be pretty darn obvious, but let me go through them anyway.

Jumper leads on headers

I absolutely positively despise breadboards. True, I might have had bad experiences because my breadboards were cheap crap, but I find myself spending more time chasing down lose connections than I do doing anything productive, so I generally much prefer just to wire stuff up using jumper leads directly on the headers. By using that approach I regularly end up in a situation where I need two leads connected to one pin, hence having a dual row is convenient.

The LDO on the original board was massively over dimensioned (can handle up to 1-2 amps). Switched that to a Torex Semicon XC6206P332MR which will happily handle the 500 mA possible from a USB port.

Having the buttons is just a massive convenience on a development board.


Schematics

The full schematics is as:

Stm32dev rev. b.svg